Layout compatibility

Workpiece and machine compatibility

Content is organized by workpiece classification, machine tool type and layout model for filtering configuration options based on site conditions.

First, by workpiece type, determine clamping, positioning, and anti-collision requirements.
Then, by machine type, determine door opening, chuck, and window size.
Finally, by layout model, decide one-to-one, one-to-two, one-to-three, or seventh-axis setup.
Once the layout is decided, consider adding vision systems and downstream stations.

Common machined parts: blocks, sheets, rods, shafts, rings, disks, strips, etc.
Supports clamping and positioning strategies for regular and semi-regular parts.
Can configure anti-collision grippers and fixtures based on surface requirements.

Lathes, milling machines, grinders, drilling/tapping centers, machining centers
Loading & Unloading coordination for turning-milling combined and composite machines
Can be expanded to integrate washing, inspection, marking, and other downstream stations

A single robot corresponds to a machine tool, configured according to workpiece, rhythm and site conditions.

One robot corresponds to two machine tools, and it needs to be calculated based on the waiting time and equipment beat.

For multi-machine collaboration, evaluation based on equipment status, range of motion and site conditions.

Start with the workpiece: weight, size, positioning reference, surface protection requirements
Then consider the machine: door type, chuck position, load/unload window size
Final layout: Compare one-to-one, one-to-two, one-to-three and seventh axis according to cycle target
After the pilot is completed, similar machine tools will be evaluated based on fixtures, changeover templates and interface records